Reading you under the table since 2012

 

by

Rachel Seigel

Most of us probably remember writing a book report at least once during our time in school. We dutifully described the plot, the setting, the characters, and any other crucial data that would let our teachers know that we’d actually read and understood the book. As we advanced into high school and university, book reports shifted to book reviews, and whether we realize it or not, there is a subtle difference which we should be remembering when we review a book. Unlike a book report, whose purpose is to offer the reader a summary of content, a review’s purpose is to critically assess the value of the book, and to recommend or not recommend it to other readers.

In my position as a buyer, I often rely on reviews to help me evaluate books for age appropriateness, quality, and potential interest to my customers. I particularly love reading reviews from bloggers whom I trust, because I can count on a them for a thoughtful, honest analysis of the book they’re reviewing, and from that I can make an informed decision. What I don’t like to see, (and I’ve seen professional newspaper reviews do this) is a detailed, point-by-point rehashing of the plot, and then just a line or two of analysis.

When reading review,nI want just the briefest of summaries so I have an idea of what the book is about, and then I want to get to the heart of what you thought and why. I think it was around second year university where my TA patiently explained to me over coffee how necessary it was to start moving away from talking about the plot, and to start analyzing the novel. This is advice I still take to heart, and recommend to anybody who writes reviews for fun, or professionally.

The guidelines for one of the journals I review for suggest no more than 100 words of a 250-300 word review be devoted to plot, and I find that in most cases (once in a while a novel is just too complicated to summarize in 100 words and I’ll stretch it to 150) this is entirely possible. There is so much you can tell a reader without giving away key portions of the novel. You can talk about whether or not the story entertained you. You can talk about the authenticity of the characters, the emotional impact, etc….

So next time you prepare to write a review of the latest book that you loved or hated, challenge yourself to summarize the story in 10 lines or less, and spend the rest of the review talking about the book- not the plot.

Rachel Seigel is a Sales/Marketing Rep and the Fiction/Picture book Buyer for EduReference Publisher’s Direct Inc. in Ontario. She also maintains a personal blog at http://readingtimbits.blogspot.com and can be found on Twitter as @rachelnseigel.

Posted in Industry Life | Leave a comment

Interview with Elizabeth Ross, Author of Belle Epoque

by

Leigh Bardugo, featuring Elizabeth Ross

BELLE EPOQUE by Elizabeth Ross is one of the YA debuts I’m most excited about this year. Set in turn of the century Paris, it promises a unique setting and also an unusual heroine: Maude Pichon, an impoverished girl who takes on a job as a repussoir or beauty foil—a plain girl hired to make her upper class companion look prettier as she makes her debut. Elizabeth and I sat down to talk about her new novel and the theme of beauty that runs through it.

Belle Epoque


BelleEpoqueCover
When Maude Pichon runs away from provincial Brittany to Paris, her romantic dreams vanish as quickly as her savings. Desperate for work, she answers an unusual ad. The Durandeau Agency provides its clients with a unique service—the beauty foil. Hire a plain friend and become instantly more attractive.

Monsieur Durandeau has made a fortune from wealthy socialites, and when the Countess Dubern needs a companion for her headstrong daughter, Isabelle, Maude is deemed the perfect foil.

But Isabelle has no idea her new “friend” is the hired help, and Maude’s very existence among the aristocracy hinges on her keeping the truth a secret. Yet the more she learns about Isabelle, the more her loyalty is tested. And the longer her deception continues, the more she has to lose.

Add BELLE EPOQUE to your Goodreads TBR list.

 

LB: First let’s talk about the inspiration for Belle Epoque.

ER: Well it all began with this short story I read by Emile Zola “Les Repoussoirs” (Rentafoil in English) about an agency of ugly women for hire. The short story really struck a nerve with me. It was cruel and fascinating at the same time. But the short story really didn’t delve into the experience of BEING one of these girls. So I wrote that story!

LB: It’s such a compelling hook and certainly very topical. Your heroine is considered plain by the standards of her day. There’s a moment in the first chapter when she realizes that she has been dubbed “ugly,” that she is “one of them.” It broke my heart a little because it’s something that I think so many girls go through, the moment when she realizes that she doesn’t look “right.”

ER: ‪Exactly – I think it’s the quintessential teenage moment. Who escapes adolescence without at some point feeling unattractive?

LB:  ‪I think those wounds stay with you. I know many beautiful women who still see themselves in the same unforgiving light.

ER:  And pretty girls feel pressure also. As one of the characters says in the book, there is always someone prettier to compare yourself to and fall short. I don’t think anyone escapes those repoussoir feelings. So I wanted to explore this theme of beauty as it’s so entrenched in girls from a young age.

LB:  ‪Absolutely. I grew up in Hollywood. I worked in entertainment. I’ve seen the way that constant judgment and valuation (or devaluation) can tear people down.

ER:  ‪Yes, working in film as an editor you’re privy to a lot of awful judgments on appearance. ‪I think I channeled some of those experiences into my book.

LB:  ‪Before we go further, I think we need to address the gender divide. There’s no question that men are evaluated on their looks as well (particularly in Hollywood), but I think the double standard is evident in the wide variety of men we see in film. A man’s face is allowed to have character (wrinkles, a big nose, a receding hairline) a woman’s face is held to a very narrow, very specific standard of beauty.

ER:  ‪Very narrow and weighted heavily on youth. I think film’s tolerance of different kinds of beauty is very low. Working in this environment brought out the same feeling of injustice I remember having as a teenager – the idea that men get to be people, but women are always ‘women’ first . They are on display as unwitting beauty contestants, judged on appearance before anything else.

LB:  ‪Still, I know boys are struggling more and more with appearance, possibly because we live in a more visual age and pictures are EVERYWHERE.

ER:  ‪And completely photoshopped.

LB:  ‪Ah yes the photoshopping kills me.

ER:  ‪Nothing feels real anymore.

LB:  ‪Working as a makeup artist, I was shocked at the standard women set for themselves because of it. They’re constantly bombarded by images that have been doctored and often they don’t realize it.

ER:  ‪That’s the thing – women are as hard on themselves as their detractors, harder maybe. Also if an unconventional beauty like Lena Dunham displays confidence about her looks, then she’s taken down. It’s as though, yes, you can be funny and have a personality, but first you must pass the pretty test.

LB:  ‪How fantastically subversive is Lena Dunham? It’s crazy that seeing an ordinary female body on television is so shocking.

ER:  ‪She’s great – she’s confident, holy crap! And why should it be shocking?! But yes those are the double standards.

LB:  ‪That’s right. Put some naked, sad sack middle-aged dude in a room with a beautiful woman and it’s like, “Oh, the tragedy of life! So poignant.” But reverse that and it’s like, “You lie!!”

ER:  ‪Hah! It’s important for young women to see other types of femininity.

LB: “Femininity” is an interesting word because it’s not just about appearance, but about behavior. Dunham is transgressive not just because she’s naked, but because she’s active and funny and demanding—while being naked.  I think that’s why I’m glad Dunham is out there. Mindy Kaling too. That visibility is powerful. And I’m glad that we’re seeing more YA books deal honestly with this.

ER:  ‪I really feel Maude [Belle Epoque] and Alina [Shadow and Bone] are kindred spirits, despite being from different genres.

LB:  ‪Orphans (or semi orphans) unite!

ER:  ‪I had no idea the beauty theme and the Plain Jane were so evident in your book until I started reading.

LB:  ‪It was important to me, so yes it’s very much there.

ER:  ‪What drew you to the Plain Jane? Did you ever feel pressure to pretty her up or make her more beautiful?

LB:  ‪Not at all. And I’ve actually been surprised when people refer to her as “ordinary” or “average.” Alina would love to be ordinary, but she’s spent her life sickly and scrawny and rather kicked around. It’s when she succeeds in mastering her power that she stops feeling tired and sick and truly blossoms. But she never becomes conventionally beautiful the way Zoya or Genya is, she’s just the most lovely version of herself.

ER:  ‪Right, which is so satisfying. For my main character, Maude, I knew that she would never become a swan. That was not the story arc of Belle Epoque. She learns to create beauty instead of be considered a beauty. Her artist’s journey is her calling.

LB:  ‪”Her calling”—YES!

ER:  ‪And like Alina, that’s how she truly blossoms and finds her voice, her sense of self.

LB:  ‪I love this—the idea that doing what you love, becoming who you were meant to be is what makes you beautiful. It gives you strength and confidence.

ER:  ‪Which is real beauty, not the perfection of symmetry or someone else’s definition of beauty.

LB:  ‪And I think that’s something that we (hopefully) grow into as we get older. We find the things we love and embrace them, we become wholly ourselves and stop trying to be something else.

ER:  ‪I think you learn to accept yourself and stop hoping for the makeover.

LB:  Oh my gosh, we’ve gone so Oprah. Be your best self, Elizabeth! But the beauty issue can be a bit of a trigger in YA. It’s something we’re not entirely comfortable talking about.

ER:  ‪I know – it’s taboo or something. Heroines are supposed to be pretty. We learn that at a young age.

LB:  I think it goes beyond that. If a heroine is pretty, she’s supposed to be unaware of it—or she risks being dubbed vain. If she doesn’t measure up to the beauty standard, she’s supposed to be equally oblivious. But beauty is a commodity and young women and girls are keenly aware of this. Your book makes the issue explicit.

ER:  That was what was so appealing about the story to me. Yes, Belle Epoque is historical fiction but really that’s a lens through which to view an issue relevant to modern day young women. The cruelty of the job at the agency is extreme. We can live it at a safer distance as a reader but maybe it shines a light on some experience in our own lives.

LB: You do something really interesting with the agency that hires Maude—it operates as a kind of evil fairy godmother. It’s a subversion of the classic makeover where her employers increase Maude’s value to them by making her look worse.

ER:  ‪Yes! That’s why the girls get put in awful unflattering dresses with their worst points accentuated.

LB:  And the agency seamstress takes pride in their creations.

ER:  ‪Exactly. It’s pretty twisted

LB:  ‪It’s perfection

ER:  ‪Hah!

LB:  ‪So I’ve gotten a look at Belle Epoque and it does happen to be a beautiful object—so much Art Nouveau gorgeousness. The cover is lovely, very arresting, but I can’t help but notice that the girl on it isn’t exactly “plain.”

ER:  ‪I love the Art Nouveau design too. I also love the cinematic feel of the image and the red/white/blue color palette reminds me of the French flag. The designer at Random House did an amazing job. But I think it’s hard for a model to exactly represent your main character. I do think she represents perfectly that belle époque era in Paris. In a way I think the reader who picks the book off the shelf and is attracted by the cover and the promise of turn of the century Parisian glamor is akin to my main character at the beginning of the book.  She is also seduced by the idea of Paris and who she might become there.

LB:  ‪Oh I love that. We’re Maude!

ER:  ‪As you read the book, I think you might recognize that girl on the cover as Maude when she becomes most seduced by the gilded life and most unlike her plain self.

LB:  ‪Fair enough. And do we even know that we’re looking at Maude? Is it possible the girl on the cover is Isabelle (the aristocrat Maude works for)?

ER: I think it’s open to interpretation. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Is she Maude or Isabelle? Sometimes I think she’s a mix of my two heroines! ‪It will be interesting to see what other countries do for the cover.

LB:  ‪I’m sure you get asked this all the time, but has it sold in France?

ER:  ‪Yes it sold in France! And Italy, and the UK.

LB:  ‪Woohoo! Go Belle Epoque!  So before we go, I want to take this even more Oprah, did you consider yourself plain growing up?

ER:  I think during my teenage years there were definitely times I didn’t like myself that much. I was a late bloomer. It wasn’t until my 20′s after university when I moved to Montreal that I felt more confident.

LB:  ‪What do you think helped you find that confidence?

ER:  ‪I just became more outgoing once I left Scotland, kind of like Maude leaving Brittany and that small town mentality. ‪I think moving countries, you can kind of reinvent yourself.

LB:  ‪What initially drew you to Montreal specifically?

ER:  I studied French in university. I had spent a summer there and it’s such a vibrant city. So I moved there after graduation. Montreal was basically my bohemian Paris! But I think finding my path helped my confidence. I started working in film.

LB:  ‪It’s interesting that both you and your heroine found your calling in a visual medium.

ER:  ‪There is definitely a piece of my soul in Maude Pichon.

To celebrate the release of BELLE EPOQUE on June 11th, Elizabeth is giving away a signed hardcover! 

 

a Rafflecopter giveaway

elizabethross_authorphotoElizabeth Ross studied French and film studies at university in Scotland. She lives in Los Angeles, California, where, when she isn’t writing, she edits feature films. Her debut novel BELLE EPOQUE will be available June 11th from Delacorte/Random House. You can visit her at www.elizabethrossbooks.com and follow her on twitter @RossElizabeth.

Leigh Bardugo is the author of the New York Times Best Seller, Shadow and Bone. She was born in Jerusalem, grew up in Los Angeles, and graduated from Yale University. Siege and Storm, the second book in the Grisha Trilogy, will be published on June 4,  2013 by Holt Children’s/Macmillan. 

Posted in Industry Life, Upcoming Titles, Writing Life | 25 Comments

A Conversation between Critique Partners: Trusting Your Own Work

by

Susan Dennard

Susan DennardSo this isn’t really a conversation post this time–more like me adding onto Sarah’s last post. Mostly because she touched on something I feel very strongly about:

The idea that having a critique partner somehow means you don’t trust your own writing.

Just as Sarah said in her post: that’s not true. In fact, I’m gonna go ahead and (excuse my language) call bullshit on anyone who says something like that.

Because it is just so, so, SO wrong. Having a critique partner is a sure sign that you absolutely trust your writing. In fact, it means you trust it enough to think it’s actually shareable. It means you believe in yourself enough to want to improve as a storyteller. It means you know your manuscript is not the best yet, but that you’re willing to make it better.

And above all, it means you trust your critique partner’s writing. You trust your CP and believe in him/her so fully you are actually willing to use your valuable time to read their work and offer feedback.

More than anything else, that giving is what makes a critique partnership strong. It can’t all be take (and should you ever find your CP only takes-takes-takes, then it’s time to move on [Sarah: I owe you, so I'm just waiting for you to send me something that isn't already in spotless condition and actually needs critiquing]). Not only should you trust yourself enough to share YOUR unpolished, unperfected writing, but you must trust in your CP enough to take their own unpolished, unperfected writing.

It’s a careful balance, critique partners. It’s a relationship that grows as your writing skill improves. Gosh, when I think about some of the stuff I let my CPs read a few years back, I cringe. And I bet they do the same. We weren’t at the writing level we’re at now; we grew together.

But even though I wasn’t the best I could be then (and I am certainly not the best I can be now; I’m always working at it), I trusted my writing. I believed in it, and I knew that I was strong enough to take a bit of criticism–and that I would only become stronger from each comment, each track-change, and each plot-hole-uncovered.

Actually, a lot of pursuits or hobbies or skills are honed by trusting yourself and trusting someone else. Back when I used to do karate, my sensei would pair the class up during drills. Sometimes he would put me with a higher belt, but more often than not, he would pair me with someone of a similar skill level. As a purple belt, I’d go with a green belt, a brown belt, or another purple. Then, during the drills, I would push myself like mad.

Example: We had this AWFUL drill called “zombie-keep-away” that required you to use all the power in your front thrust kick to keep away the “zombie”…who was really just your partner holding a giant pad. Because my partner would always be pushing me (quite literally), I would max out my effort–no holding back. And then when it was my turn to hold the pad, I wouldn’t go easy either. Me and my partner would grow stronger together; our skills would get honed together; and we trusted each other to not only help all the way to the end of the drill, but to also push all the way to the end.

You can’t improve if you aren’t pushed to your limits. And just as my thigh muscles would always SCREAM at me after a particularly rough round of zombie-keep-away, I was stronger by the time next week’s drill rolled around.

It’s the same with critique partners. Our feelings ALWAYS sting in the face of criticism–no matter how long you’ve been doing this or how close you are with your CP. But with time, it’ll sting less. It’ll become more of a “huh, I guess she’s right. I’d better redo that.” Plus, the more you critique, the better you get at spotting your OWN mistakes. I have learned more about writing from my critique work than I have from any workshop, text book, lecture, or convention combined. It’s just like martial arts: you can get the gist from a book or kata, but zombie-keep-away will really test how strong your front thrust kicks are. ;)

So the next time you hear some a$$hole say, “I don’t believe in critique partners. It’s a sign you don’t trust your own writing,” you can give them a nice front kick in the stomach and count that as one zombie kept away.*

*You probably shouldn’t do that, actually. I think that could potentially get you arrested. But you can flick them an ever-so-polite bird instead. ;)

Susan Dennard is a reader, writer, lover of animals, and eater of cookies. You can learn more about her on her blog or twitterHer debut Something Strange and Deadly is now available from HarperTeen, and you can look for the prequel, A Dawn Most Wicked, in June 2013–plus the sequel, A Darkness Strange and Lovely, in July.

Posted in Beginner Resources, Inspiration, Writing Life | Tagged , , , , | 15 Comments

The Age of Transformation

TGIF

by

JJ

___

Beloved Middle Grade

Lately I’ve been preparing for a pretty big life move, and for the past few weeks or so I’ve been packing up a storm. Some things are relatively easy to pack (clothes, shoes, etc.) but I’ve spent the most hours and the most agony over what to do with my books.

I’ve always had a bit of a book hoarding problem (don’t we all?) but I knew that I had to be utterly ruthless when it came to deciding what to take and what to donate. No more “Oh I’ll get to it later” or “Maybe I’ll read it again”. No more excuses. If I hadn’t read it in over a year, or if I hadn’t reread at least twice, it was going to get cut.

It was fairly easy to cull my adult novels; I find grown-ups boring for the most part, even though I am one myself. Gone were the literary tomes I felt I should read but didn’t enjoy, gone were the bestselling novels that I felt obligated to know about but didn’t care. Gone, gone, gone. I was feeling pretty good; I managed to get rid of about 50% of my adult bookcases. But what I lingered over, what I agonized over, were the books I read when I was a child, the age I first discovered the joy of reading.

Old School Children's Fiction

I think most readers have an age when they were transformed by reading. For me, it was the years between 8 and 14 years of age, the age when I first read Lloyd Alexander’s Chronicles of Prydain, Brian Jacques’ Redwall books, Philip Pullman’s Sally Lockhart series, and so many more. It was these books I could not bear to let go, even if the pages were crumbling, even if I hadn’t cracked open a Tamora Pierce in more than a year, even if I hadn’t reread Madeleine L’Engle’s Time quartet all the way through more than once. I just couldn’t bear to let go of these books. Even now the act of merely holding my battered mass market copy of Mariel of Redwall brings with it such a strong sense memory of what I was doing when I read it for the first time: sitting in my grandmother’s room in our house in Eagle Rock, California with its grey-green granite floor, feeling its cool stone beneath my bare feet, the only bearable place in our un-air-conditioned 1970s concrete house that sizzling summer of 1995.

Even adult books I read during this age of transformation managed to escape the donation pile. Memoirs of a Geisha by Arthur Golden, Fingersmith by Sarah Waters, The Red Tent by Anita Diamant—if I had read these as an adult, I don’t think I would have been as moved by them as I was when I was 14. I think the books I read and loved during this formative age define and characterize the books I seek now.

What about you? Do you have an age where reading transformed you? Do you think this affects what you like to read or what you like to write now?

___

JJS. Jae-Jones (called JJ)’s emotional growth was stunted at the age of 12, the age when adventures were imminent and romance just over the horizon. Who wants to read about bills, midlife crises, and infidelity? If that’s what it means to be an adult, no thank you! Other places to find JJ include TwitterTumblr, and her blog.

Posted in TGIF | 9 Comments

Ask Alex: Editorial Assistants

by

Alex Bracken

Alexandra Bracken

This month’s question came to me through Tumblr anonymously, and I have a feeling it’s been on a few of your minds! As always, I’m happy to take questions here in the comments, but you’re more than welcome to email me if you’d like to ask privately. I’ll always double-check to make sure it’s okay to post the question here.

From Anon:

Could you talk about being an Editorial Assistant? That’s my dream job, but I always hear that you don’t actually edit or acquire and that a lot of it is administrative.  And maybe this is a little too personal (feel free to ignore!), but why did you switch to marketing?

Unsurprisingly, editorial assistant positions are some of the most competitive, fiercely sought-after positions in the industry. It makes sense–when you think of publishing, what’s the first job you think of? And how many glamorized instances of it have you seen on TV and in the movies?

That’s why I always feel like a jerk saying I actually didn’t apply for my editorial assistant job! In fact, I spent most of the Columbia Publishing Course telling everyone that I didn’t want to be an editorial assistant, would never want to be one, and I wasn’t actually applying for any of those positions. See, I’ve always understood that I’m not a particularly strong editor (especially as far as copyediting goes), and I was reluctant to prove myself right. But then I got the phone call from HR about coming in to interview… and it was in children’s publishing… and I was two weeks out of the course totally jobless.  So after meeting my supervisor and seeing what kinds of books she published, I accepted the job when she offered it. I don’t regret my time as an EdAss for a second, but over time I did realize that I needed a better balance between my day job, my writing career, and, you know, my fledgling social life. So to answer your last question off the bat, I switched to the career I had been after from the beginning (marketing), and one that would hopefully provide a more 9-5 work schedule so I could write after work and on the weekends.

Speaking very generally, most editorial assistant positions are VERY administrative, but the degree of it depends on who your supervisor is. For instance, my boss was a bit more old school and needed someone to maintain her calendar for her, answer her phone, schedule her lunches, do mailing, copying, etc. A handful of the other assistants did some of those tasks, but not all of them.

There’s quite a bit of information tracking as well. I controlled our team’s time-off calendar, tracked submissions, returned picture book art, and routed passes of manuscripts/covers/marketing materials between departments. If your supervisor is looking to acquire a project, you will also be creating P&Ls (profit and loss statements, which factor in advance, estimated sales, potential production costs, etc. and tell you if you’re actually going to turn a profit on an acquisition) and handling contracts and amendments.  This is the part of the job that requires you to be timely and organized–or at least good at remembering to put all of your tasks in your Outlook calendar! You have to get the authors their payments and finished copies on time!  You have to make sure you’re reporting all acquisitions to the right people! You have to remember when all of those important meetings are to pull the information your supervisor will need!

Aside from administrative tasks, chances are you’ll be reading a good chunk of the manuscripts coming to your boss for consideration. You’ll be giving him or her feedback and, eventually, working on editorial letters alongside him or her. But it is a rare thing for an editor of any level to be able to sit at their desks and read or focus entirely only editing–most of it has to be done after hours or over the weekend which can be a bit frustrating at times when you start to think in terms of how much you’re getting paid vs. your actual hours. That aside, this was actually was my favorite part of the whole job: reading my different coworkers’ projects and giving editorial feedback, or brainstorming possible solutions to sticky plot projects. You’re also working directly with the authors themselves which…um…  can be a total joy or a total nightmare depending on the personality you’re working with. ;)

In reality, what you’ll spend the bulk of your time doing is writing copy. Every book on a list gets: catalog copy, cover summary (a kind of descriptive form for design to help them figure out a cover direction), bound galley copy, flap copy, titlesheet copy, launch presentations, sales meetings presentations, and later paperback edition copy. I also wrote quite a bit of EXTRAS content for the back of different paperbacks. The only thing more overwhelming than keeping up with the copy deadlines was trying to keep up with one author’s fan mail, which I had to respond to. I would spend whole days addressing these little postcards, and usually ended up bringing piles of it home so I could force my roommates to help me!

As to when you get to acquire… again, it totally depends on your supervisor. My supervisor saw acquisitions as something that should come after being promoted to assistant editor (after 2+ years as an editorial assistant) or an associate editor. Other imprints–usually smaller ones–had assistants who were extremely hands-on and editorial from the very beginning. It was often the case that they would acquire projects as assistants, and that acquisition was quickly followed by a promotion to assistant editor. The projects that you’re working on independently as an assistant are usually paperback editions or repackages of older titles.

I loved being an editorial assistant–and I loved the people I worked with–so I feel very privileged to have had the experience I did. It’s a lot of hard work that demands organization and being able to keep numerous balls up in the air at the same time, but, man, it’s so worth it. Sound off in the comments if you have any specific questions about the life of an Editorial Assistant in kidlit, or if you have a question for next month!

Alex lives in New York City, where she works in children’s publishing, writes like a fiend, and lives in a charming apartment overflowing with books. Her two novels, Brightly Woven and The Darkest Minds, are both available now. You can visit her online at her website, Twitter, or

Posted in Industry Life | Tagged , , | 4 Comments
  • About Pub Crawl

    We're a group of authors and industry professionals (formerly known as Let the Words Flow) who blog about all things writing, publishing, and books!

  • Recent Brews

  • Brews on Tap

  • Past Brews

  • Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts.

  • Book of the Month

    Plain Kate
  • Grab a button!

  • Current Homebrews!