How I Edit

I thought that for today’s Industry Life post, I would provide a bit of a rundown on my editorial process. Editing is one of my favourite things to do in the world (good thing I work in publishing); there’s nothing I like more than looking at a manuscript and figuring out how to tease out the writer’s voice in such a way as to tell the best story possible.

Every editor has a different editorial process, just as every writer has a different writing process, so bear in mind my methods are not universal. I am fairly systematic when it comes to editing manuscripts, but while the process might be structured and organised, editing itself is not so easily codified or quantified into a rigid “how-to”. Like any creative discipline, it requires a blend of intuition, inspiration, and plain, old-fashioned hard work.

I am a visual-verbal person, so I tend to envision manuscripts not as words on a page, but story entities existing in a three-dimensional mindscape. (I know, I know; it sounds like mystic woo-woo nonsense, but WHATEVER. πŸ™‚ I am MAGIC!)

A visual representation of me. Some liberties might have been taken with the likeness.

But first things first: these are the steps I take when editing a manuscript:

  1. A cold read.
  2. Identify the story shape.
  3. A second read.
  4. An editorial letter.
  5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 until story is in the right shape.
  6. Fine-tuning read.
  7. Line edits.
  8. Final read.

Steps 1 through 4 is where the “artistry” of editing happens. The manuscript is, of course, first and foremost the author’s property: I can’t go in and change things willy-nilly to suit my own aesthetic tastes. But I love identifying the story a writer wants to tell, and I love finding ways to tease out those threads, to make the emotional heart shine.

1. Cold Read, or First Impressions are Crucial

When reading a manuscript for the first time, I try and wipe my brain of any preconceptions. I am going to approach the manuscript not as an editor, but as a reader. I don’t take a lot of notes during a cold read; I want to form as holistic of an impression as possible. What is the story about? Who are my favourite characters? What did I like about it? What did I not like about it?

After a cold read, I tend to sleep on it. My subconscious is fairly good at sorting out lots of information, and I often find that after a good night’s rest, all the nebulous thoughts I had about a manuscript will have coalesced into a coherent whole.

2. Identify the Story Shape, or Finding the Core

This is where the “magic” happens. In my opinion, this is the very definition of editing.

I tend to think of the one-sentence thread that describes the manuscript’s emotional arc as the “story shape”, which I tend consider the core, or the spine, or the structure of the book. It can be as simple and cliche as “A journey of self-discovery” or “Man discovers what he’s strived for all his life may not be worth the effort”. There are only so many stories in the world. In my opinion, the more archetypal the core story, the more subconscious resonance it has with a reader. What makes a work truly unique and different is howΒ that story is told, rather than the core story itself. After all, you can build many different types of houses, but the core building materials and foundations will be the same no matter what.

Once the story shape is identified, I know how to proceed. My brain is fairly systematic when it comes to organizing information; it moves from large conceptual levels to small detail levels fairly intuitively. It tends to view manuscripts a bit like this (but less linear and more…three-dimensional):

Core β†’ Themes β†’ Character β†’ Plot details

Core identified, then we move on to themes. What themes feed into the core story? What character details feed into the general themes? What plot details inform both character and theme?

3. A Second Read, or Parts of a Whole

The second (or more) reads are done with a critical eye. I’ve taken off the reader hat and put on the editor hat. This is where I look for specific places that can be tightened or refined. If the first read was about absorbing the story as a whole, then this read is looking at its parts and how it all fits together. At this stage, I usually take notes, especially if I have questions. I find questions the most useful when it comes to editing because questions often inform an answer. It could be as simple as “Why does Character X leave home?” or as complicated as “What is the backstory between Characters A and B that makes them act in this way?”

If identifying the story shape was essentially an “outside-in” read in that I was identifying the broadest, overarching story before getting further and further into the manuscript layers, then this second read is almost the opposite. I start with the smaller details and work my way out, an “inside-out” process during which work at the micro-levels so they feed and inform the macro ones.

4. An Editorial Letter, or Wherein I Try and Take My Three-Dimensional Mindscape and Describe It in Words

I won’t lie; my editorial letters tend to be longish. I actually prefer jotting down the big bullet points in a general email and requesting that an author speak with me on the phone rather than writing all my thoughts into a formal letter. I feel speaking is much more organic than writing when it comes to creative genesis, and I’m much more in tune with the ebb and flow of a writer’s process when I can speak with him/her. Because my three-dimensional mindscape of a manuscript is fairly complex and not easily quantified into a linear flow without getting intimidatingly long, I much prefer talking with the author directly. However, I tend to take the editorial letter(s) in stages. Biggest concepts first, then working my way down to the smaller things.

5. Repeat Steps 3 and 4 As Needed, or Filling in the Details

Growing up, I was a visual artist. In high school, I was part of a visual arts conservatory, and before we started any projects, we always did thumbnails and sketches before we started refining the sketches in more detailed drawings. One couldn’t just paint an incredibly detailed shoe without first figuring out where the shoe fit in the grand scheme of things. Was it on a foot? Could you see the entire body to which that foot was attached? What position was the body in? What was the body doing in the scene? Etc.

Each editorial pass is like another level of refinement in a painting. First, the general sketch in which the scene is blocked. Next, solidifying the shapes and filling in general ideas, like a background. Next, the lineart. Next, the color-blocking. Next, the shadows. Etc.

Here are the steps taken for a drawing I did of me, White-Harp, and my boyfriend Bear.

6. Fine-tuning Read, or What It Says On The Tin

Once the manuscript is pretty much in the shape it needs to be, then this read is essentially one about the real, nitty-gritty details. Like…figuring out on a sentence level whether or not it serves the core story.

7. Line Editing, or What’s Your Style?

These are the cosmetic touches. If we compare editing a manuscript to building a house, then line edits are when you go in and figure out which work of art would look best in this corner, or whether or not French Regency or mid-century Scandinavian furniture best suits the house. At this stage, I will underline passages that I feel don’t quite fit with the story, or point out on a sentence-level a character inconsistency, etc. Some editors heavily line edit (Raymond Carver’s editor famously changed entire sentences); others apply a lighter touch. I’m one of the latter; I try not to mess too much with the writer’s words themselves–only to point out places that I feel are weak.

7. Final Read

This last read is more or less me verifying that the manuscript is ready to be transmitted. Transmittal in a publishing house generally means sending the manuscript into production, when copyedits (oh yes, copyedits are something else altogether), first pass pages, galleys/ARCs, jacket copy, covers, etc. happen. Production is when a writer’s words and story are put in the process of turning into a book.

So there you have it! A long-winded treatise on how I edit, and how I view the process. All editors have a different process of course, but I tend to apply the visual art style: broadest to smallest. Hope you guys found this interesting!

19 Responses to How I Edit

  1. PK Hrezo Jun 14 2012 at 7:10 am #

    Thats very useful info! Thanks for sharing. I’ll be bookmarking this page for the future. πŸ˜‰

  2. Erin Bowman
    Erin Bowman Jun 14 2012 at 8:51 am #

    Thanks for sharing your approach to the process, JJ! I especially like the visual representation of you in GIF form. And I don’t know what you’re talking about re: the likeness. The resemblance is uncanny πŸ˜‰

  3. Kaye M. Jun 14 2012 at 9:08 am #

    This is awesome stuff right here. Thanks for sharing – and I love that cute picture of you, White Harp and Bear! Such a darling family πŸ™‚

  4. Kat Zhang
    Kat Zhang Jun 14 2012 at 9:19 am #

    Thanks for the awesome, detailed post, JJ! πŸ˜€

    Also, that first gif is the more fantastic gif ever.

    • JJ
      JJ Jun 14 2012 at 11:05 am #

      It’s pretty much the best. πŸ™‚

  5. Sarah G. Jun 14 2012 at 9:26 am #

    Thanks, JJ, for the insight into your editorial process. I write editorial letters on occasion, but as a freelance reader to agents, and it is really useful to know how other people (especially editors!) approach the process.

    • JJ
      JJ Jun 14 2012 at 11:04 am #

      Thanks!

  6. Erica O'Rourke Jun 14 2012 at 11:02 am #

    This is fascinating — I’ve always loved hearing about writers’ processes, but editorial ones are just as interesting. And I love that you can include a Moffat-verse pic in any post you write!

    • JJ
      JJ Jun 14 2012 at 11:04 am #

      Haha! (I am actually not a fan of Moffat…but that is a long story…)

      • Erica O'Rourke Jun 14 2012 at 11:46 am #

        I think I need to hear this story sometime.

        • JJ
          JJ Jun 14 2012 at 11:47 am #

          It’s not super long so much as…the things he says and the problematic issues in his writing are starting to overshadow the fact that he actually HAS talent…

  7. debbie Jun 14 2012 at 12:37 pm #

    That was so insightful. Thank you. I know you said that everybody edits differently but the way you set out how you break the process into stages is going to help me edit and revise my own work. It makes alot of sense (and it does seem so obvious with hindisght!) to have different readings looking at different things. I tend to try and sort out everything at once and that’s why I end up going round in circles. Thanks again.

  8. April Tucholke Jun 14 2012 at 12:37 pm #

    Mystic woo-woo nonsense is my favorite kind of nonsense.

  9. Elsie Chapman Jun 15 2012 at 11:04 am #

    This is a fantastic post, and really, really enlightening. Thanks for sharing!

  10. Charla Jun 23 2013 at 2:55 pm #

    Following numerous seconds the codes will show up on the scanner.
    This can then effortlessly change out an erroneous code appears on your dashboard.

  11. CheapJordansFreeShip Jul 19 2013 at 3:20 pm #

    As the device costs drop, said Crump, “Even small-town police departments have it within their budget to buy one.” The cost of storing data has also dropped she said, so police can store images “not just for days but for weeks or months or even years.” Eventually, she said, agencies could share the data to build a detailed travel profile “of all Americans simply because they chose to drive a car.” Cheap Jordans Free Shipping http://www.hspa.com/jordansforsale/

Leave a Reply

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.